Slifka Knowingly Breaks Federal Law?

The upcoming weekly West Hartford Perspective will be online Monday, but I felt the need to get this out as soon as it came to my attention. 3 This link (http://www.audreyblondin.com/Nbysiewicz.html) takes you to the full story, but I will summarize. It's apparent that Mayor Scott Slifka broke the law (The Hatch Act - 5 U.S.C. §§ 1501-1508) when taking a position in the Secretary of State's office. The Hatch Act prohibits state employees who work for agencies funded in whole or in part by Federal funding from, "being candidates for public office in a partisan election." 1 Most would say let's give him a pass because he probably didn't know that this law existed. How about we don't...."Slifka said the Secretary of the State office receives federal funding through the Help America Vote Act and that they determined it would not be appropriate for him to continue. The West Hartford mayor added that they thought this might be a problem when he signed on with Bysiewicz last year, but decided to take the job with the understanding that it could be a short-term appointment."2 I'm not one to point fingers, but if the Courant and Mayor Slifka are going to point fingers at Mark Sinatro for requesting public information from the town manager who works for him, then it's time someone point a finger or two back (and I don't mean the index finger). The Courant's blatant disregard for balanced and fair journalism is despicable. Thanks, Quig

1. United States Office of the Special Counsel. Hatch Act for State and Local Employees. http://www.osc.gov/ha_state.htm
2. Audrey Blondin for Secretary of the State of Connecticut. BYSIEWICZ MOVE UPSETS CONTENDERS. By Dan Levine, 2005. http://www.audreyblondin.com/Nbysiewicz.html
3. Thank you, once again, to Judy Aron for bringing this to my attention.

Coming Soon...

Hi everyone, sorry for the extended absence, but busy is as busy does. I've been asked by multiple people around town if I am going to continue the blog and the answer is yes. Starting Monday February 6 look for the first weekly installment of what I'll initially call West Hartford Perspectives. I'll take a look at varying aspects of West Hartford from different angles of the human perspective. Look for topics that relate to development, kids, sports and of course, politics. Talk to you soon....... quig

Congratulations to Mark Sinatro

A huge congratulations goes to Mark Sinatro for winning a seat on the Town Council. The hard work Mark put in paid off and finally the town council will have a voice of reason. To the Democrats and incumbents (wow, I spelled it right) I also say congratulations...It's really easy to win when you have the Courant in your back pocket. Not once did the Democrats discuss the real issues in town and the Courant backed their play by painting the republicans as anti-blue back. All I can say to that is see you in two years when all of the opponents views on what will happen with the project will come true. One note of housekeeping. I've started moderating the comments, which means either I approve them or reject them. I don't mind people opposing my side of the argument, but I'm not going to allow personal attacks, Publicous (oh, did I spell that wrong?) Good luck Mark, a lot of people will be supporting you over the next two years.

Sinatros Call on Democrats to End Negative Campaigning

I received this from the Sinatros this morning and wholeheartedly agree. Not once has the republican side of the aisle sought to discredit the names of the democratic candidates. We do believe the republican candidates bring a lot more to that table than the incumbents, but have kept the campaign positive so far. Please read this note from Steve & Mark.

Stephen and Mark Sinatro Tell Democrat Leadership: “Enough is Enough” The party who calls itself the party of consensus and team building should be ashamed. The mudslinging perpetrated by the Democrats should cause us all to wonder who we call our leaders. There is no place for inaccurate reporting and innuendos. We are disappointed that the Democrats would choose to leave inflammatory and false literature at our neighbor’ s doorsteps. The information in their flyer is filled with falsehoods and completely inaccurate statements. It demonstrates a lack of leadership and integrity and is counter productive to the positive campaign we have been running. We demand that our opponents put an end to the negative attacks! These are the Facts:

• Steve and Mark Sinatro have the professional expertise and personal integrity to implement Blue Back Square. Can you trust a Mayor who appears in Advertisements paid for by the Developers?
• Steve Sinatro and his law firm have not cost the town a penny in litigation.

Tell the Democratic Leadership to tell the truth

• Steve and Mark Sinatro have served West Hartford, its children and its seniors for many years. On Election Day help them continue their tradition of service.

Steve Sinatro

• President, West Hartford Youth Football League
• Youth Sports Coach
• Recipient of the Ct Sec. of State, Public Service Award

Mark Sinatro

• Member UCONN Div. of Athletics
• Bd of Dir. WH Exchange Club
• St. Peter Claver, Religious Ed Instructor

Paid for by Stephen Sinatro for Town Council, Tom Filomeno, Treasurer and Mark Sinatro for Town Council, John McCormick, Treasurer

Incumbents Absent from Taxpayer's Association Panel

In another stunning display of arrogance, the current running council members decided that taxes aren't important in West Hartford, so they decided not to show up to the West Hartford Taxpayer's Association forum last night. Those who were at the event included Mark Sinatro, Steve Sinatro, Tom Knox, Mike Zullo, Joe Visconti, Sylvia Schindelman and Lib Brassil-Spinella. Absent were the members of the council who at the last budget process struggled to keep the tax increase down to 4.63%. The members of the panel spoke of creative revenue streams, increasing our tax base with low impact/high tax businesses and trimming the fat in the administration among other topics. It was unfortunate that we couldn't hear from the incumbents on how they propose to keep taxes down...One could infer that they intend to do nothing of the kind. Once again, I call on the Hartford Courant to report the news. The fact that the democrats have avoided 2 consecutive WH Taxpayer's Association meetings is news. Have a great day...

A Note from Republican Candidate Tom Knox

October 31, 2005 I would like to thank the editors of this paper for meeting with me and my running mates. Although I knew that I would not be endorsed, I could never have foreseen their reasoning. To use prior service on the Council and publically supporting Blue Back as the only litmus test for endorsement is narrow minded. It is offensive to think only the current council members are capable of seeing this project through to fruition. I am getting involved in politics, not due to Blue Back, but because of the many other issues currently being ignored. It is very convenient for the incumbents that the Blue Back situation is taking center stage and preventing discussion of the real issues facing our town.

One of my concerns is reducing taxes while maintaining quality town services. If “reasonable” or “expected” tax increases are the standard to which council members hold themselves, then we are in real trouble. I must point out that with our tax increases, the council created a fee for bulk pick-up and cut leaf collection in half. Why are we paying more and getting less?

One other concern is the safety of our residents and, more specifically, our children. As a father of three, two of which are in the public school system, it concerns me greatly that the parents at Sedgwick Middle School were not immediately notified of a gun in their school. This “nuance” approach of not informing parents quickly of situations that impact their children’s safety is abhorrent. Recently we have had a local bank robbery and a woman was attacked in one of our parks. It would seem prudent to any reasonable citizen that the police force should not be at a 12% deficit in manpower. The money for these missing officers is already provided for in the budget.

Blue Back must not be the place on which we rest our laurels. We need to throw that same energy, and hopefully not the same divisiveness, into other areas of town. Parts of Elmwood have been left fallow for years. Where is the Council’s concern for that area? Erecting condos and changing the old Caldors into a self-storage facility is not the answer. I want to aggressively pursue opportunities to develop Elmwood with community input at every level. I will address the slipping school rankings by insisting the liaison committee between the Board of Education and Town Council actually meets. This would encourage a frank discussion of the budget and force the two bodies to work toward a singular goal.

We can no longer afford to have only one point of view represented on Town Council. Right now many residents have taxation without representation. I disagree with Mayor Slifka and Councilwoman Carpenter that consensus is the key ingredient in good government. Consensus is not leadership; its overabundance fosters stagnation and complacency. While it is acceptable to applaud the few accomplishments of the current council, we must not forget that this town has issues other than Blue Back. Thomas I. Knox, M.D. Republican Candidate for West Hartford Town Council

Sinatros Thank Supporters

October 31, 2005 Dear Friends and Supporters, The outpouring of support and kindness during the past 3 months, but most especially this past weekend has overwhelmed us. The articles that have appeared recently in the Courant have been difficult to read given how private our family is, however we take comfort in how many of you have reached out to us with your supportive thoughts and words of encouragement. We are not running, as the Courant and Scott Slifka and Barbara Carpenter would have you believe, to dismantle Blue Back Square. We have repeatedly stated that we are committed to seeing this project through. We believe in the Democratic process and this town has spoken. The construction has begun, and we plan on working towards its success should we be fortunate enough to be elected. The recent articles in the Courant have been inflammatory and some of the statements are not factual. For those of you who were with us at the Republican Town Convention this past July, you know that Mrs. Carpenter’s name was placed on the ballot. The party was planning on nominating her despite its disagreement with her on several matters. Mrs. Carpenter and Joe Verrengia both voted for Blue Back Square. Whether the town committee agreed with that vote or not has little to do with why Mrs. Carpenter no longer calls herself a Republican. It was Mrs. Carpenter’s failure to appear at her own convention and subsequent withdrawal of her name as a candidate that forced the party to choose another candidate. We fully expect that there will be more negativity stemming from either our opponents or the media in the next 7 days. We have chosen to run for public office out of a duty to serve our town in a different capacity then what we have in the past. Our family has a legacy of service to the community. We are proud to be participating in this election with our fine running mates, proud of the vigorous campaigns we have run, and even prouder to call each and every one of you our friends. Mark Sinatro and Steve Sinatro

Courant Wrong in Sinatro Article

Below is a letter from Judy Aron, a prominent advocate for a fair shake in West Hartford. Let me preface her letter with my sentiments on the article from Sunday’s Courant titled, Prominent Family Tries Politics. When I read this article, I was extremely disappointed at Daniella Altimari’s lack of journalistic integrity in saying that Barbara Carpenter, “then got squeezed off the Sinatro-led GOP ticket.” This is an outrageous statement. Barbara Carpenter did nothing but quit the party that backed her and was planning to back her once again. Her name was on the ballot at the convention and she didn't even bother to show up and explain her actions. The republican party did not turn it’s back on Carpenter, she turned her back on the party because she would rather continue to do Mr. Feldman’s bidding and she didn't want to have to hear anything that went against that. Let’s not forget that Carpenter and Feldman are running partners…and he's her ultimate boss. Do I need to say conflict of interest here? Thanks for the letter, Judy. Dear Editor, Regarding your articles about the Sinatro brothers running for Town Council in West Hartford; Barbara Carpenter was not "squeezed off the GOP ticket". Let me refresh your memories and hope you'll do the right thing and print a correction. Ms. Carpenter never showed up to the convention and we all expected her to be part of the ticket, because her name was already on the convention's ballot! I believe you even reported that fact back when we had the convention. The truth is that she had been at odds with the Republican Town Committee for a long time. She ignored every conversation Town Committee chair, Mike Seder, had with her regarding her actions and votes on the Council. She did not represent the Republicans in this town, and this is a proven fact now that she is endorsed by every union she can lay her hands on. In fact, a poll taken by the Republican Town Committee on their membership showed a no confidence vote, and even so we had all intentions of having her on the ballot.. she just never showed up.. she was not squeezed off... she pried herself off with a crowbar.Please get your facts straight! Additionally, saying that the Sinatro's profited from the Blue Back lawsuits: perhaps you could have mentioned how Updike Kelly Spellacy, Scott Slifka's law firm profited from it's representation of brownfield development agencies, or how Chuck Coursey's involvement as Executive Director of CT Partnership for Balanced Growth is also a conflict of interest, or how past council members are financially involved with Day Berry and Howard, Pepe Hazard, or Kroll McNamara law firms for direct gain on this project. Would you care to investigate Carolyn Thornberry's intimate involvement with the Lt. Governor and his protégé Jonathan Harris, and how they might have conspired to get $500,000 worth of state money for the movement of the Science Center to Elmwood (with developer Richard Heapes on the Board of Directors of the Science Center?). While you are busy publicizing how much people gave to campaigns, how about enumerating the lobbyists that donated to Thornberry's warchest? There was a lot of mischief on the part of our current Town Council, and people were in bed with lots of people... so why are the Sinatro's being made the bad boys here? What is good for the goose, is good for the gander.. and at least the Mr. Sinatro's law firm is/was representing the interests of people who would be harmed by the arrogance of this current Town Council. There is nothing wrong with allowing the Burr Street residents their day in court. Judy Aron

Election Reflections by Patty Sanko-Lowry

Since the Democrats took majority control of the Council in 2001:

• Taxes are up 20% to 44.07 mills, compared to Newington (36.4), Simsbury (35.2), Glastonbury (32.1), Farmington (24.7), Greenwich (11.1). We have the third highest mill rate in the State (and this before revaluation skewed the data) but…
• Fees are now charged for bulk trash, leaf pickup has been reduced to one, and student-athletes must pay to play on fields in dire need of renovation
• Our middle schools are more dangerous, test scores continue to drop. We’re now below the median score for towns in our comparative group and our changing demographic is cited as the sole reason?
• Family-owned local businesses that created our beloved and unique West Hartford Center, like Metzger’s, aren’t able to compete with national chains – threatening our “village charm” and local control.
• Our town administrators have become among the highest paid in the State.

West Hartford’s reputation as a desirable place to raise a family is rapidly becoming a false promise. We’re becoming a place for the very rich or very poor, with a shrinking middle class – why aren’t we learning from the demise of our cities? This Town Council would rather focus on consensus-building then what they are elected to do. They provide no real oversight of our Administration, but rather sanction its agenda – regardless of legality or good practice. And they know you’re too busy to ask what’s going on. Abraham Lincoln’s fear, “that government of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth” has become a reality, replaced by a government of the insiders, by the politicians, for the money. Vote for true oversight, change, leaders with vision. Vote Sinatro, Visconti, Knox, and Zullo for Council. Vote Brassil-Spinella, Schindelman for Board of Education.

Submitted by Patty Sanko-Lowry

Citizen Voices Concern about Changes to GDC Project

Elmwood Renaissance by Patti Sanko-Lowry 24 Grove Street I am here tonight to address the Council in regard to the September 16th communication from Mila Limson, Town Planner regarding her intention to approve modifications to SDD 48; in particular the elimination of the 4 penthouse dwellings approved for the original school building. Earlier this year, GDC applied for a special permit which enabled them to begin a partial demolition of the original school house building for the sole purpose of looking at the structural members so that they could determine if the building would be able to handle the addition of a fourth floor. In a meeting in April Tom Gissen, then Vice President, told me that they were going to have to eliminate the 4 penthouse units on the original Talcott School building because of the very concerns highlighted in this Administrative Amendment. So why wasn’t this part of the application in July? Why are you now being asked to look at this as ”an unanticipated and immediate danger to the occupants of the building; [and that] delay in construction on the building would further its deterioration as a blighted property creating health, safety and welfare issues with respect to the general public and the Elmwood residents in particular?” According to GDC’s building schedule this building isn’t scheduled for renovation until March of 2006. The SDD ordinance was changed in March, 2004 giving the Town Planner the authority to administratively approve, without limit, additional applications for changes to SDD applications within a twelve-month period as required to address an unanticipated and immediate health safety and/or welfare need. Prior to this revision she could only approve one per 12-month period. The example of potential use cited by Corporation Council during the March ’04 public hearing was that a couple bought a condo and shortly thereafter the husband was diagnosed with a medical condition that required equipment in the house that must be powered 24/7. He wanted to install a generator outside his unit. This situation was clearly an immediate health need. Because his unit was part of an SDD application and the developers of the complex had already had a recent approval, he was required to go through the usual public process. GDCs application does not comply. The safety issue doesn’t actually exist at the moment, and could probably be remedied with appropriate structural improvements. GDC did not include the removal of these penthouse units along with the lost pergolas, trellises, canvas canopies, French doors, larger windows and natural materials that were removed from the July application. They knew about potential structural issues then. This invalidates their argument for “immediate safety needs” – they knew about this at the time of their prior application. Why are we giving up the 4 luxury view units serving the true empty-nester – single floor, 1- to 2-bedroom units with garden patios? And what view will the mid-rise penthouse owners have of this building without these penthouses and gardens? 24 rooftop HVAC compressors (with the accompanying noise) aligned in military precision on a flat membrane roof. Very industrial. And what about the lost tax revenue associated with these 4 units. Conservatively over 10 years the lost revenue amounts to half a million dollars. Can we ask for nothing in return from this developer? We’ve given so much and received so little. Now we’re losing tax revenue on top of it all. Because of the negative tax implications, the weakening of the luxury design approved in the SDD application and the curious timing of this new request, we recommend that you deny this application and send it back with a recommendation to the Town Planner to have the structural reports reviewed with an eye to making these luxury penthouses possible. Other options include adding a rooftop garden to the existing building, or perhaps a return of the hardscaping and garden features lost in the July application in exchange for this reduction in scope.

Republican Committee strongly urges the WHPL Main Branch Remain Open

Press Release, October 25, 2005, from the West Hartford Republican Town Committee: A resolution was unanimously passed at the October 24th meeting of the West Hartford Republican Town Committee that opposed the closing of the Noah Webster Library during the construction of Blue Back Square Center. Republican Town Committee Chairman, Michael Seder, said he understands the need for public safety. However, using the same standards, does that also mean that the Town Hall and the Police Department buildings will be closed during their respective renovations and expansions? Knowing the importance of the Noah Webster Library to the social and educational fabric of West Hartford, it is unconscionable for the Town Administration and Town Council Leadership to allow the Library to close for a year or more. The sudden emergence of this issue shows a lack of foresight, planning and communication to the public that is extremely troubling. The two branch libraries cannot adequately accommodate the basic needs and services that West Hartford residents have come to expect. The branches simply do not have the space, books, computer terminals or children’s facilities to provide what is needed. The Republican Town Committee felt that a better solution was to allow the Library to remain open and slightly delay the completion of this aspect of the project. Seder said, "Denial of library services is just not an option." We would like to hear an explanation from the Library Director, Library staff, or the Library Commission Chair about their transition plans for the next year. We would also like an explanation as to how and why this situation now exists.

Is this how things work around this town?

Hi everyone, election day is coming, so don't forget to vote on November 8, 2005. Did anyone watching the town council meeting on October 11, 2005 notice when Deputy Corporation Counsel Pat Alair mentioned that a lot of the work had been done on the walkway between S. Main St and LaSalle Road before the town council voted on easements that would make way for this project? Yep, that's right, work by town employees was performed prior to the town council approving resolutions authorizing the easements. This is outrageous. This is the town management acting of it's own free will without the consent of the town council. I've asked this before and I'll ask it again, does the town council work for the town management or does the town management work for the town council? Some of you may say this is no big deal, but I would argue that this is a clear example of what's been going on in this town for a long time. They just happened to get caught this time. This doesn't speak to the town making a mistake. This speaks to a town management that is arrogant to the highest degree. Was this act illegal? I'm no lawyer, but... Has anyone been over there? I went the next evening and saw that curbs were purchased, the fence adjacent to the Post office was down, the area on the South Main side was graded and curbs were installed. Seems like a lot of planning, purchasing, receiving, and actual work was completed. How long before this council meeting was the work done? Seems like it had to have been at least a month or two. Where does this end? I'll tell you where it ends. November 8. Let's make it a clean sweep. Vote in those who care about this town, not their political future...Vote in those who will ask Pat Alair why the construction started prior to the town council's vote...Vote in those who will listen to the people of this town not only in the majority, but those whose point of view makes sense, for the good of the town, not for the good of a new development...Vote for those who will make a stand in a council meeting by actual voting against things that aren't right. Not one councilmember asked why the work had started. Because if they did, they knew the town manager would have been livid. I'll save the candidate recommendations until later, but listen to the candidates and you'll hear the ones who are planning for the future and you'll hear the ones who are spending their time defending their past. Thanks, Mark

Library Closing for 20 Months?

According to some credible sources, I received word today that the West Hartford Public Library adjacent to the Board of Education building will be closed from anywhere from a year to 20 months during construction of the Blue Back project. I recall statements at the public hearing by those involved in Blue Back Square that the Library would remain open during the expansion. Sure, plans change during large construction projects, but this will be a huge problem for those in town who utilize the library heavily. Children won't be able to play and read in the library for a long time. Will our taxes go down as we lose another service for a year? I know, stupid question... Seems like around every corner there's a change in this plan. Was this deception from the outset to win some votes? It all seems fishy to me. More to come.....

A note in support of Joe Visconti for Town Council

To The Editor, It is time for a real change in Town Government as we head into some very difficult times for West Hartford. We are facing revaluation, higher energy costs, MDC rate increases and probable state cuts in municipal funding, and at the same time demanding more in Town services and Education funding. I am writing this letter in support of Joseph Visconti for Town Council. Many would ask me why I would want to support an Independent Candidate, especially one that has stirred up so much controversy in West Hartford. I support him because he has taken the time to understand the issues, and come up with some new approaches to solving the issues facing us. He has stirred up controversy because the difference between Joe and other candidates is that he is willing to share the political inside with the electorate so that they can make informed voting decisions and understand the issues completely. The people representing the status quo don't like that. Joe will not tell you half truths and hide things under the rug. He won't allow Town administration to continue to play accounting games or call the shots or make up their own convenient ethics rules. Joe is not in the running for ego, power and control. He wants to insure that the taxpayer is getting more than a fair shake, and Joe has a no nonsense plan to make our town schools and public works be the best they can be with the limited resources that we have. I am voting for Joe because he isn't about politics and hidden agendas, but because I know he doesn't represent the "same old same old" in local politics and he isn't controlled by those higher up in the political food chain. Judy Aron 40 North Quaker Lane West Hartford

Blue Back Going to Trial

A couple of days before the town decided to move forward with the closing, Judge Booth ruled that the town did not supply sufficient evidence to prove they did not act "capriciously and arbitrarily" in moving forward with this project. This means we will be going to trial! This is very important as the town will have to answer why they did not secure independent analysis of traffic, economic and financial aspects of the project as well as state what they did when, etc. Obviously this was a huge blow for them, however as usual, arrogance, irresponsibility, and reckless disregard for the financial well being of our town has prevailed with our leadership and they declared they would close and begin to move forward despite the risk to the tax payers that we might win our lawsuit. Our legal position is as positive as it has ever been yet as you read this the town is rushing to cut down all the trees on the green and begin paving it over and erecting a parking garage. As I stated to Tom Pouleo of the Courant, the town continues to show disrespect for not only the Burr St residents, the tax payers, but more importantly the entire Connecticut judicial system. While I am not happy about living next to a construction zone while we are winning in court, I am absolutely thrilled that we are one step closer to exposing a $150 million NO BID deal riddled with inside connections. Stay tuned, the battle is far from over! From Jasyn Sadler

Woman fired for caring for grandchild during Hurricane Katrina

I'm asking that anyone who reads this Blog email info@connectpositronic.com to let this company know how deplorable it was to fire Barbara Roberts (See MSNBC story: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9353052/). It will just take a couple of moments of your time to let them know that this kind of behavior is disgusting. Thanks, Mark

Blue Back Financing

In the latest article by Tom Puleo of the Hartford Courant (http://www.courant.com/news/local/fv/hc-whdbbs0910.artsep10,0,1613243.story) it looks as if the town and Blue Back Square have received financing. This seems like a huge risk by the financiers with the CT State Supreme Court set to review some of the current lawsuits. With continued vigilance, I have made a Freedom of Information Act request from Mr. Feldman to review all documentation around the financing. Please look here for more information soon. Remember the election is November 8, 2005. Elect Mark Sinatro and Steve Sinatro for the town council and Libby Spinella for the Board of Educaiton. Thanks

Town Council & Town Government

I have to say that I'm very pleased that I've gotten at least a few people engaged in a debate about Blue Back Square. My enjoyment comes because on no other forum has a free flowing debate occurred. Not in the paper, not in our town government and not on any visual media. At no point in this process did the town council or town government give credence to the views and suggestions of opponents of this project. That's the number one reason citizens are angry. That's the number one reason residents close to the project asked Westfarms for their help in trying to stop this monstrous, no-bid project. (and there was no lie in what I just said...it is monstrous and it is a no-bid project). If the town needs to build a school, do we put it out to bid? YES. If the town needs to build an addition on to the Senior Center, do we put it out to bid? YES. Then for what reason can we look to are we building two parking garages, an addition to the main library and a bunch of traffic light and road widening without any sort of bidding process? The reason I suggest is that money is being funneled back into the coffers of one or more of the people who are guiding this project. Sure, this is a harsh suggestion and one that will probably get me railroaded right out of town by Mr. Feldman and his town elite, but what other explanation can be made to give some kind of reason to what has gone on in the last couple of years. I can tell you right here and now why the No vote did not win...our side didn't spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to get people out to vote. Once again the cash machine that is BBS, LLC pulled out all the stops. They set up a booth at Celebrate West Hartford, one of the very events that will be completely blown away by this project. No, they say, Celebrate will go on, but I'd like to see how that will work when the Town Green is paved over and a NO-BID parking garage is built on top. The thing that saddens me the most as I talk with "Vote Yes" people is that they have no idea what the project really is. They say, "they aren't paving over the town green," that's been in this town for a couple of hundred years. I say yes they are, send them a link to the map of the project, and they say...."I can't believe it." THEN WHY DID YOU VOTE YES? Anyway, we lost...and I see no reason in losing when a fair fight is fought, but this town is being over run by people who care nothing for the future of the town. Have a great day. Mark

Vote No, June 22, Need I say it again?

Please follow the links below to more information from opponents of Blue Back Square. There is a flyer produced by Save the Center and a link to the editorial by Jasyn Sadler who is one of the residents of Burr Street with the courage to take on this soon to be debacle.

• Save The Center Flyer currently being passed door to door by Save the Center.
• Jasyn Sadler's Letter from Courant, Sunday June 19, 2005.
• Blue Back Square Timeline: This is a smattering of various happenings during the last few years that are of interest.
• Robert E. Tuthill Letter, as passed around via email. I'm not sure if this was printed...I will update this when I find out.

Thank you to Save the Center for the submission of the flyer, thank you to Judy Aron for submitting the timeline, thank you to Robert Tuthill for an excellent letter and Thank you to Jasyn Sadler for for an excellent letter and for standing up for the rights of his family and neighborhood by taking this to court. Thank you, West Hartford RAC Note: West Hartford RAC did not produce the information in the flyer, the letter or the timeline. These materials were submitted by various individuals or groups in opposition to the development of Blue Back Square. I am posting these materials here so more West Hartford residents can read the information submitted by the opposition.

More information on Mr. Feldman

Click the link below in order to view a new post on Mr. Forrey's BLOG, River Vices. Mr. Forrey is an English Professor at Shawnee State University in Portsmouth Ohio. New River Vices post on Feldman Please get out and vote on Wednesday June 22, 2005. I urge you to vote no and allow our fellow residents the chance to have all their legal challenges heard. Thank you, West Hartford RAC